• Reading the Constitution

  • Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
  • De: Stephen Breyer
  • Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
  • Duración: 12 h y 16 m
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars (47 calificaciones)

Prime logotipo Exclusivo para miembros Prime: ¿Nuevo en Audible? Obtén 2 audiolibros gratis con tu prueba.
Elige 1 audiolibro al mes de nuestra inigualable colección.
Escucha todo lo que quieras de entre miles de audiolibros, Originals y podcasts incluidos.
Accede a ofertas y descuentos exclusivos.
Premium Plus se renueva automáticamente por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.
Reading the Constitution  Por  arte de portada

Reading the Constitution

De: Stephen Breyer
Narrado por: Stephen Breyer
Prueba por $0.00

US$14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Compra ahora por US$20.24

Compra ahora por US$20.24

la tarjeta con terminación
Al confirmar tu compra, aceptas las Condiciones de Uso de Audible y el Aviso de Privacidad de Amazon. Impuestos a cobrar según aplique.

Resumen del Editor

A provocative, brilliant analysis by recently retired Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer that deconstructs the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court’s supermajority and makes the case for a better way to interpret the Constitution.

“You will not read a more important legal work this election year.” —Bob Woodward, Washington Post reporter and author of fifteen #1 New York Times bestselling books
“A dissent for the ages.” —The Washington Post
“Breyer’s candor about the state of the court is refreshing and much needed.” —The Boston Globe


The relatively new judicial philosophy of textualism dominates the Supreme Court. Textualists claim that the right way to interpret the Constitution and statutes is to read the text carefully and examine the language as it was understood at the time the documents were written.

This, however, is not Justice Breyer’s philosophy nor has it been the traditional way to interpret the Constitution since the time of Chief Justice John Marshall. Justice Breyer recalls Marshall’s exhortation that the Constitution must be a workable set of principles to be interpreted by subsequent generations.

Most important in interpreting law, says Breyer, is to understand the purposes of statutes as well as the consequences of deciding a case one way or another. He illustrates these principles by examining some of the most important cases in the nation’s history, among them the Dobbs and Bruen decisions from 2022 that he argues were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.
©2024 Stephen Breyer (P)2024 Simon & Schuster Audio
  • Versión completa Audiolibro
  • Categorías: Historia

¿Te gustan los libros? Te encantará Audible.

Transforma tu día

Transforma tu día

Cambia el scrolling interminable por la escucha interminable. Los quehaceres pueden ser divertidos.

Placeholder Image Alt Text

Escucha en dónde sea

No puedes darle vuelta a la página mientras conduces, pero puedes escuchar

Placeholder Image Alt Text

Lleva toda tu biblioteca contigo

Tus historias van a donde tú vayas. Los audiolibros viajan ligero.

Placeholder Image Alt Text

Escucha y aprende

Descubre historias que pueden renovar tu mente, tu bienestar y tu vida.

Placeholder Image Alt Text

Alcanza tus objetivos de lectura

Descarga títulos para escucharlos sin conexión, en cualquier parte del mundo.

Placeholder Image Alt Text

Encuentra tu nicho

Con miles de títulos para explorar, hay algo para todos.

Prueba por $0.00 Renovación automática por $14.95 al mes después de 30 días. Cancela en cualquier momento.

Lo que los oyentes dicen sobre Reading the Constitution

Calificaciones medias de los clientes
Total
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    35
  • 4 estrellas
    6
  • 3 estrellas
    3
  • 2 estrellas
    2
  • 1 estrella
    1
Ejecución
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    32
  • 4 estrellas
    3
  • 3 estrellas
    5
  • 2 estrellas
    1
  • 1 estrella
    1
Historia
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 estrellas
    34
  • 4 estrellas
    4
  • 3 estrellas
    2
  • 2 estrellas
    0
  • 1 estrella
    2

Reseñas - Selecciona las pestañas a continuación para cambiar el origen de las reseñas.

Ordenar por:
Filtrar por:
  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

A reflection of current times

This is a monumental book that clearly defines the current times and should be read by every citizen who values the concepts put forward by the Constitution and the founding fathers. It was written so that every American can understand the meaning of the Constitution without being a lawyer or a student of law.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

My Opinion

I enjoyed this book because it gave me food for thought in 2024 when Democracy is being challenged and rights being removed from Americans.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

An Argument for Pragmatism

The thoughtful former Justice argues against relying solely on textualism and originalism, but instead argues for also using statutory purpose, legislative history, precedent, and workability. Justice Breyer illustrates his points by discussing individual cases. In explicating his pragmatic, sometimes apparently instinctual decision making, Justice Breyer also sometimes demonstrates the inconsistency of his method, as when he discusses the two cases addressing display of the Ten Commandments.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Masterful

This work is one that shows both a deep understanding of jurisprudence and of the English language.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Thoroughly engaging book.

Never a dull moment. Wisely edited with a noted nod to the editors. The flow is natural. It felt like a condensed Constitution course without getting preachy. Very pragmatic ;)

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Everyone should listen to this to understand better what is happening with the court. So helpful for context!

I thought the historical aspect was so very valuable. And the explanation of the differing philosophies was simple and easy to understand. helped so very much to understand some of what feels like chaos when watching the news. Taking the time to walk thru case examples was great learning reenforcement. Lastly, we should all realize how critical our votes are as it relates to this most important aspect of our government.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Interesting yet unconvincing

I really liked the book and enjoyed the many examples. Nevertheless, I was not convinced that “pragmatism” is significantly superior to “textualism”. Both systems are subject to bias, cherry picking, and over generalization. Both systems seem equally problematic.

The narration was quite laidback (I listened at 1.5) but excellent.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Essential Read for Anyone Trying to Understand the Modern SCOTUS

I absolutely loved this book and I shared the “snail dilemma” with my Business Law course. It’s a timely book and is though provoking and provides an in-depth understanding of the pitfalls of Textualism and Originalism - well beyond one’s typical understanding, perhaps based more on the “political realities” of the matter. Breyer goes behind the scenes and explains how he decided cases, providing excellent insight. I only wish Breyer had been Chief Justice. Breyer is an American Treasure. I highly recommend this book.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona

  • Total
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    5 out of 5 stars

Why text alone misleads

Clearly communicated. Great examples of real cases and decisions. Illustrates why a Justice needs to use all available tools at their disposal if they are to maintain a workable democracy.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

  • Total
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ejecución
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Historia
    1 out of 5 stars

Very Annoying Narration

I should have listened to a sample before getting this. The narration is so annoying. I thought that a former Justice would have a decent delivery, but the narration is halting and the vocal variety is too severe. Breyer often raises his voice for emphasis, I guess. This jolting delivery makes it hard to follow what he's saying. I can't really judge the content because the way he reads his book is so distracting. Fortunately, I have the book in print, so at least I'll have a better chance of following what he's trying to say. The narration is so bad that I couldn't get beyond two chapters. )-: I wish he had chosen a professional narrator for this work.

Se ha producido un error. Vuelve a intentarlo dentro de unos minutos.

Has calificado esta reseña.

Reportaste esta reseña

esto le resultó útil a 1 persona